Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms Core i3-4000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2057 days newer than Core i3-4000M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4000M
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 37 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-4000M - 207 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4000M - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
207
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.67/FPS
100%
Price, £
£346
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £346 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4000M | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |