Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms Core i3-390M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 3719 days newer than Core i3-390M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-390M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 51% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-390M - 651 vs 432 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-390M - 16 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-390M
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Core i9-11900
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-390M | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
