Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8300 outperforms Core i3-390M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8300 is 2593 days newer than Core i3-390M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-390M
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i3-8300 - 35 vs 62 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-390M - 160 vs 142 FPS
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
FPS
160
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.54/FPS
100%
Price, £
£86.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £86.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44043 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
347
26.671790930053806%
Multi-Core
686
17.934640522875817%
Intel Core i3-390M | vs | Intel Core i3-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Arrandale | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 62 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |