Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms Core i3-390M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 4747 days newer than Core i3-390M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-390M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 180% better in FIFA 23 than Core i3-390M - 244 vs 87 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-390M - 8 vs 4 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
244
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.45/FPS
100%
Price, £
£108.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £108.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14637 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-390M | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Arrandale | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |