Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Core i3-390M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 4388 days newer than Core i3-390M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-390M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 17% better in World of Tanks than Core i3-390M - 586 vs 501 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-390M - 24 vs 4 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
586
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.55/FPS
100%
Price, £
£319.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £319.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10366 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-390M | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Arrandale | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |