Key Differences
In short — FX-6200 outperforms Core i3-390M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6200 is 414 days newer than Core i3-390M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-390M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-390M - 167 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-390M - 6 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i3-390M
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-390M | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Arrandale | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 3 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
