Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 4822 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 166% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-380M - 583 vs 219 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-380M doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
583
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.94/FPS
100%
Price, £
£546.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £546.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7216 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | Intel Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Arrandale | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |