Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700 outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700 is 2624 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
- Performs up to 49% better in War Thunder than Core i3-380M - 186 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 12 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
FPS
186
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.21/FPS
100%
Price, £
£224.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £224.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | Intel Core i7-8700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Arrandale | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |