Buy on Amazon
£84.6
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2700K outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-2700K is 363 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Performs up to 4% better in Valorant than Core i3-380M - 702 vs 674 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-380M doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-2700K
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FPS
702
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.12/FPS
100%
Price, £
£84.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-2700K 3.5 GHz Quad Core Processor (Socket 1155, 8MB L3 Cache, HyperThreading Technology, Retail)
Buy for £84.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-380M
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Core i7-2700K
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
