Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1771 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-6100 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 12% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-380M - 128 vs 114 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-380M doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-380M
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Core i3-6100
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-380M
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Single-Core
329
27.554438860971526%
Multi-Core
628
26.88356164383562%
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
