Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 2359 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 21% better in Rust than Core i3-380M - 180 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 12 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-380M
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
