Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900HX outperforms Core i3-350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900HX is 5114 days newer than Core i3-350M.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900HX
- Performs up to 21% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-350M - 228 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-350M - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-350M doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i3-350M
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Core i9-14900HX
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-350M | vs | Intel Core i9-14900HX |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel BGA 1964 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
