Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i3-350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4800MQ is 1208 days newer than Core i3-350M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-350M
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 35 vs 47 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Performs up to 11% better in New World than Core i3-350M - 107 vs 96 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-350M - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-350M doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i3-350M
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-350M | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 47 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
