Key Differences
In short — FX-4350 outperforms Core i3-350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4350 is 1208 days newer than Core i3-350M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-350M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Performs up to 3% better in Lost Ark than Core i3-350M - 223 vs 217 FPS
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
223
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.27/FPS
100%
Price, £
£59.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-350M | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Arrandale | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |