Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 2144 days newer than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 4% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i3-3250 - 259 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 16 vs 4 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
259
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.16/FPS
100%
Price, £
£558.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £558.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |