Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 3676 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 86% better in Starfield than Core i3-3240T - 82 vs 44 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 24 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £321.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76569 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
15.739436619718312%
Multi-Core
971
5.51359945488615%
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |