Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1093 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-3240T - 276 vs 273 FPS
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
76.93631669535283%
Multi-Core
971
97.88306451612904%
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
