Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 4144 days newer than Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 8% better in Dead Space than Core i3-3240 - 156 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 16 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £181.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75421 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
28.749351323300466%
Multi-Core
1137
11.07431576896854%
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |