Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Core i3-3227U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 1386 days newer than Core i3-3227U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3227U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 17 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 24% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-3227U - 530 vs 426 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3227U - 44 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-3227U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3227U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 22 |
| 4 | Threads | 44 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 145 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
