Key Differences
In short — Core i7-870 outperforms Core i3-3227U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-870 is 1218 days older than Core i3-3227U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3227U
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Core i7-870 - 17 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-870 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-870
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-3227U - 208 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3227U - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
208
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.44/FPS
100%
Price, £
£299.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £299.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12380 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3227U | vs | Intel Core i7-870 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |