Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i3-3227U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2094 days newer than Core i3-3227U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3227U
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 17 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Core i3-3227U - 201 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3227U - 24 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
201
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.15/FPS
100%
Price, £
£431.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £431.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10861 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3227U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |