Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3225 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3225 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3225.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3225
- Up to 96% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - £9.84 vs £235.0
- Up to 96% better value when playing Control than Core i7-10700K - £0.05 vs £1.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Core i3-3225 - 203 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3225 - 16 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for £9.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
Buy for £235 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3225 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |