Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3225 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2498 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3225.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3225
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 6% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-3225 - 124 vs 117 FPS
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i3-3225 - £4.99 vs £9.84
- Up to 50% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-3225 - £0.04 vs £0.08 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3225 - 12 vs 4 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for £9.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
124
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.04/FPS
100%
Price, £
£4.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £4.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3225 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |