Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3225 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3225 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2634 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3225.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3225
- Up to 84% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - £9.84 vs £60.0
- Up to 81% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Athlon 3000G - £0.06 vs £0.32 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 7% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-3225 - 190 vs 178 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3225 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for £9.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
Buy for £60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3225 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Athlon |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |