Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3225 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3225 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 2194 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3225.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3225
- Up to 89% cheaper than Athlon 200GE - £9.84 vs £86.0
- Up to 88% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Athlon 200GE - £0.04 vs £0.34 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 0% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i3-3225 - 252 vs 251 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3225 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for £9.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
Buy for £86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3225 | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Athlon |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | No |