Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3783 days newer than Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 35 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 19% better in Death Stranding than Core i3-3220T - 253 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 32 vs 4 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
253
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.09/FPS
100%
Price, £
£529.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £529.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1855 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
458
14.750402576489533%
Multi-Core
941
4.309989465488022%
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 150 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |