Buy on Amazon
£16.26
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 97% cheaper than Core i7-10700 - £16.26 vs £494.75
- Up to 96% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i7-10700 - £0.1 vs £2.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 21% better in World of Warcraft than Core i3-3220 - 189 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 16 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i3-3220
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
156
82.53968253968253%
Value, £/FPS
£0.1/FPS
100%
Price, £
£16.26
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-3220 3.30 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread 3 MB Cache 55 W CPU Processor LGA 1155
Buy for £16.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1917 minutes ago
Core i7-10700
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
189
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.62/FPS
3.816793893129771%
Price, £
£494.75
3%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i7-10700 Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz LGA 1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for £494.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1917 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i3-3220
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Core i7-10700
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3220
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
33.206831119544596%
Multi-Core
1085
15.477888730385164%
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
