Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11500 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11500 is 3116 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i5-11500 - £13.99 vs £139.74
- Up to 88% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-11500 - £0.12 vs £0.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-11500 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Performs up to 23% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-3220 - 143 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 12 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
116
81%
Value, £/FPS
£0.12/FPS
100%
Price, £
£13.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £13.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18469 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
143
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.98/FPS
12%
Price, £
£139.74
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for £139.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18469 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i5-11500 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |