Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Core i3-3217U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2890 days newer than Core i3-3217U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 17 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 250% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-3217U - 63 vs 18 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3217U - 20 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3217U | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |