Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 5300G outperforms Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 5300G is 3024 days newer than Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 5300G - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 5300G
- Performs up to 40% better in Starfield than Core i3-3210 - 63 vs 45 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 8 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-3210
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Ryzen 3 5300G
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3210
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
29.644729178800233%
Multi-Core
1018
18.569865012769064%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 5300G |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2021 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Cezanne |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
