Key Differences
In short — FX-4350 outperforms Core i3-3120M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4350 is 211 days newer than Core i3-3120M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3120M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Performs up to 1% better in Watch Dogs: Legion than Core i3-3120M - 125 vs 124 FPS
Watch Dogs: Legion
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-3120M
Mobile • Sep 30th, 2012
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3120M | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 30th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
