Key Differences
In short — FX-4300 outperforms Core i3-3120M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4300 is 23 days newer than Core i3-3120M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3120M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Performs up to 1% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Core i3-3120M - 106 vs 105 FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
106
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.23/FPS
100%
Price, £
£24.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £24.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 30th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3120M | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 30th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |