Buy on Amazon
£170
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms Core i3-2367M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 2196 days newer than Core i3-2367M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2367M
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i5-8400 - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 23% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-2367M - 106 vs 86 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2367M - 6 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-8400
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
106
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.6/FPS
100%
Price, £
£170
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-8400 Retail - (1151/Hex Core/2.80GHz/9MB/Coffee Lake/65W/Graphics)
Buy for £170 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-2367M
Mobile • Oct 1st, 2011
Core i5-8400
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2367M | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
