Key Differences
In short — FX-4350 outperforms Core i3-2350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4350 is 576 days newer than Core i3-2350M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2350M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-2350M - 208 vs 203 FPS
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65580 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 1st, 2011
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2350M | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
---|---|---|
Oct 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |