Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms Core i3-2330M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 3870 days newer than Core i3-2330M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2330M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 38% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-2330M - 238 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2330M - 12 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
238
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.47/FPS
100%
Price, £
£110.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £110.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2330M | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |