Key Differences
In short — FX-8150 outperforms Core i3-2328M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8150 is 325 days older than Core i3-2328M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2328M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Performs up to 1% better in Far Cry 3 than Core i3-2328M - 121 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2328M - 8 vs 4 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2328M | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |