Key Differences
In short — Core i3-2120T outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-2120T is 1458 days older than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-2120T
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-2120T
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Single-Core
423
72.80550774526678%
Multi-Core
816
82.25806451612904%
Intel Core i3-2120T | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
