Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-14100F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-7400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-14100F is 2561 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-7400.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 9% better in Death Stranding than Core i5-7400 - 242 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i5-7400 - £72.97 vs £152.25
- Up to 57% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i5-7400 - £0.3 vs £0.69 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
242
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.3/FPS
100%
Price, £
£72.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £72.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
222
91.73553719008265%
Value, £/FPS
£0.69/FPS
43.47826086956522%
Price, £
£152.25
47%
Buy for £152.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1176
47.19101123595505%
Multi-Core
3232
38.56801909307876%
Intel Core i3-14100F | vs | Intel Core i5-7400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |