Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 3865 days newer than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 21% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-3250 - 134 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for £87.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74385 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Single-Core
532
21.34831460674157%
Multi-Core
1130
13.484486873508352%
Intel Core i3-14100F | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |