Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-13100 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-13100 is 4866 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 19% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-860 - 131 vs 110 FPS
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i7-860 - £103.97 vs £270.91
- Up to 68% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-860 - £0.79 vs £2.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 60 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
131
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.79/FPS
100%
Price, £
£103.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £103.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1837 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
110
83.96946564885496%
Value, £/FPS
£2.46/FPS
32.113821138211385%
Price, £
£270.91
38%
Buy for £270.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1837 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Single-Core
446
19.79582778517532%
Multi-Core
1463
19.940029985007495%
Intel Core i3-13100 | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |