Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i3-12100T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 343 days newer than Core i3-12100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100T
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 17% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-12100T - 732 vs 627 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100T - 32 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-12100T
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2022
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 26th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
