Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-12100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-12100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 245 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-12100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - £119.95 vs £465.99
- Up to 68% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-13900KF - £0.25 vs £0.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 58 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 23% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-12100F - 587 vs 479 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 32 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
479
81%
Value, £/FPS
£0.25/FPS
100%
Price, £
£119.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £119.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
587
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.79/FPS
31%
Price, £
£465.99
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for £465.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |