Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600 outperforms Core i3-12100F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600 is 344 days newer than Core i3-12100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600 - 58 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-12100F - 151 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
147
97.35099337748345%
Value, £/FPS
£0.61/FPS
100%
Price, £
£89.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £89.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58286 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Single-Core
2225
91.3007796471071%
Multi-Core
7457
60.0402576489533%
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Core i5-13600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |