Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100 is 1608 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100
- Performs up to 5% better in Monster Hunter: World than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 268 vs 255 FPS
- Up to 70% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - £95.0 vs £315.0
- Up to 72% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - £0.35 vs £1.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 60 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100 - 24 vs 8 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
268
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.35/FPS
100%
Price, £
£95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
Buy for £315 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |