Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i3-1125G4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 854 days newer than Core i3-1125G4.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-1125G4
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 19% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-1125G4 - 208 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-1125G4 - 32 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-1125G4
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-1125G4 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 28 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
