Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10980XE outperforms Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10980XE is 194 days older than Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10980XE - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10980XE doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10980XE
- Performs up to 0% better in Ready or Not than Core i3-10320 - 271 vs 270 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 36 vs 8 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
271
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.55/FPS
100%
Price, £
£1233.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £1,233.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1641 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1539
98.02547770700637%
Multi-Core
4626
38.598247809762206%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i9-10980XE |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Comet Lake | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 18 |
8 | Threads | 36 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |