Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2433 days newer than Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-4130 - 243 vs 225 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i3-4130
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
