Buy on Amazon
£5.56
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 2705 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 14% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron G1610 - 422 vs 369 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-10300 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
369
87.44075829383885%
Value, £/FPS
£0.02/FPS
100%
Price, £
£5.56
100%
Value Winner
BQTEC Intel Celeron G1610 2.60 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread 2 MB Cache 55 W CPU Processor LGA 1155
Buy for £5.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3037 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-10300
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
27.22044728434505%
Multi-Core
739
15.411887382690303%
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
