Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Core i3-10110U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 253 days newer than Core i3-10110U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10110U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Core i3-10110U - 203 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10110U - 16 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
203
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.08/FPS
100%
Price, £
£218.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £218.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15492 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Aug 21st, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10110U | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Aug 21st, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |