Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Core i3-10110U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 45 days older than Core i3-10110U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10110U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 15 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 19% better in F1 23 than Core i3-10110U - 241 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10110U - 24 vs 4 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-10110U
Mobile • Aug 21st, 2019
Ryzen 9 3900X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10110U | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
|---|---|---|
Aug 21st, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
